Path of Funds:
The Risk of Using Intermediaries
in EB-5
Intermediaries such as currency exchangers, remittance agents, and relatives are sometimes used in cross-border transfers. In EB-5 cases, they can create problems because USCIS wants to see a lawful source of funds and a clear, unbroken path of funds into the new commercial enterprise (NCE). When the transfer chain becomes unclear, the case can face delays, RFEs, or more serious concerns. USCIS continues to place heavy weight on complete documentation and clear project-level records, including the project’s Form I-956F status.
Why Intermediaries Can Create Risk
Being able to trace the path of EB-5 funds is essential to the success of a petition. Every extra transaction makes it harder to show exactly where the capital came from and how it moved. If the funds leave one account and arrive to an account that is not in the investor’s name, USCIS may question whether the path of funds is complete.
Commingling is another problem. When money is mixed with other people’s funds, it becomes harder to prove which dollars belong to the investor, making the file harder to defend.
Licensing and AML (Anti-Money Laundering) issues also matter. In many countries, registered money transfer agents and foreign exchange dealers must be licensed and keep proper records. Unlicensed intermediaries are a major red flag in an EB-5 investment case, especially where anti-money-laundering documentation is closely reviewed.
Common Intermediary Risk Scenarios
01
Informal currency brokers
cash may be handed over locally, then equivalent dollars appear elsewhere. Without a licensed remittance trail, the path is difficult to prove.
02
Family
A sibling or relative may gather transfers to meet the investment amount. Unless those funds were first documented as gifts or loans to the investor, the trail can still look unclear.
03
Cash-heavy steps
Cash withdrawals, cash deposits, and cashier’s checks with no clear narrative often weaken the paper trail.
Red Flags USCIS May See
- Incoming funds from an account that is not in the investor’s name.
- Large same-day movements through intermediary accounts.
- Missing wire records or FX paperwork.
- Handwritten receipts or unlicensed exchange invoices.
- Sworn statements with no bank proof.
- Money that leaves and later re-enters through entities controlled by the investor.
- Screenshots instead of official bank statements.
If an Intermediary Must Be Used
The safest approach is to avoid intermediaries when possible. If one must be used, the transfer should be documented as if it were being reviewed line by line.
A stronger file should include:
- The intermediary’s license or registration.
- A letter confirming the transfer details.
- Full bank statements and wire confirmations.
- FX records, receipts, and transaction IDs.
- A clear ledger showing each step of the transfer.
It is also important to separate the source of funds from the path of funds. The source shows how the money was earned. The path shows how it moved. One set of records does not replace the other.
Gifts and Loans
If the money came from a gift, the gift should be documented before it moves into the EB-5 structure. The gift deed should identify the donor, the amount, the relationship, and the fact that repayment is not expected. .
If the money came from a loan, the loan agreement should be clear and supported by the lender’s lawful source of funds. If the loan is secured, the collateral should be documented as well. After that, the transfer into the EB-5 project or escrow should come from the investor’s own account.
Currency-Control Countries
In countries with strict currency limits, USCIS usually expects even more detail. Multiple transfers can be acceptable if each one is supported by banking records and exchange confirmations. The total should still match the amount being claimed.
Using proxy senders is risky. If family members are involved, each gift or loan should be documented first, and only then should the money move from the investor’s account. In some cases, a short legal memo explaining the local rules can help USCIS understand the regulatory context and reduce the likelihood of an RFE based on unfamiliar transfer mechanics.
If the Intermediary Was Already Used
If the funds already moved through an intermediary, the trail should be reconstructed as fully as possible. That may include the intermediary’s ledgers, KYC records, wire confirmations, and its own bank statements.
Sworn statements can help explain the story, but they should support banking records, not replace them. A clear timeline and cross-referenced exhibits can make the file easier to follow and reduce the chance of delay.
Why This Matters
The EB-5 regional center and fund administrator will usually want the money to come from the investor’s named account and be fully documented. USCIS’s March 2026 project-first processing model also makes the project’s documentation environment more important, because investor petitions are reviewed only after the project’s I-956F is decided. For EB-5 investors, a clean transfer path is one of the best ways to keep the case moving smoothly.
Key Takeaway
Intermediaries are not necessarily prohibited, but they do make an EB-5 investment harder to document. The cleaner the transfer trail, the easier it is to show a lawful source, clear path, and proper compliance.
get started
Schedule a Consultation
Discuss your eligibility and review current investment opportunities with our experienced EB-5 professionals.
