Path of Funds:
The Risk of Using Intermediaries
in EB-5
Why Intermediaries Can Create Risk
Being able to trace the path of EB-5 funds is essential to the success of a petition. Every extra transaction makes it harder to show exactly where the capital came from and how it moved. If the funds leave one account and arrive to an account that is not in the investor’s name, USCIS may question whether the path of funds is complete.
Commingling is another problem. When money is mixed with other people’s funds, it becomes harder to prove which dollars belong to the investor, making the file harder to defend.
Licensing and AML (Anti-Money Laundering) issues also matter. In many countries, registered money transfer agents and foreign exchange dealers must be licensed and keep proper records. Unlicensed intermediaries are a major red flag in an EB-5 investment case, especially where anti-money-laundering documentation is closely reviewed.
Common Intermediary Risk Scenarios
01
Informal currency brokers
cash may be handed over locally, then equivalent dollars appear elsewhere. Without a licensed remittance trail, the path is difficult to prove.
02
Family
03
Cash-heavy steps
Cash withdrawals, cash deposits, and cashier’s checks with no clear narrative often weaken the paper trail.
Red Flags USCIS May See
- Incoming funds from an account that is not in the investor’s name.
- Large same-day movements through intermediary accounts.
- Missing wire records or FX paperwork.
- Handwritten receipts or unlicensed exchange invoices.
- Sworn statements with no bank proof.
- Money that leaves and later re-enters through entities controlled by the investor.
- Screenshots instead of official bank statements.
If an Intermediary Must Be Used
The safest approach is to avoid intermediaries when possible. If one must be used, the transfer should be documented as if it were being reviewed line by line.
A stronger file should include:
- The intermediary’s license or registration.
- A letter confirming the transfer details.
- Full bank statements and wire confirmations.
- FX records, receipts, and transaction IDs.
- A clear ledger showing each step of the transfer.
It is also important to separate the source of funds from the path of funds. The source shows how the money was earned. The path shows how it moved. One set of records does not replace the other.
Gifts and Loans
Currency-Control Countries
In countries with strict currency limits, USCIS usually expects even more detail. Multiple transfers can be acceptable if each one is supported by banking records and exchange confirmations. The total should still match the amount being claimed.
Using proxy senders is risky. If family members are involved, each gift or loan should be documented first, and only then should the money move from the investor’s account. In some cases, a short legal memo explaining the local rules can help USCIS understand the regulatory context and reduce the likelihood of an RFE based on unfamiliar transfer mechanics.
If the Intermediary Was Already Used
Why This Matters
Key Takeaway
Intermediaries are not necessarily prohibited, but they do make an EB-5 investment harder to document. The cleaner the transfer trail, the easier it is to show a lawful source, clear path, and proper compliance.
get started